PSYCHOLOGICAL FASCISM
by David Icke
From
"...and the truth shall set you free"
http://home.swipnet.se/allez/Local/7/psycho_fas.htm
"The
sophisticated exercise of control utilises the ability to keep people oppressed
yet contented. Much better to make them think it was their idea to go to the
gallows" Anon
The underlying theme of all you have read is the manipulation of the
human mind. You cannot control billions of people with tanks in the streets and
soldiers at the door. You can only do it by divide and rule - and by
programming the mass consciousness (public opinion) into believing that what
you want to do is a good idea or the only option.
This is crucial to both understanding how the manipulation works and to
thinking on a more street-wise vibration which will
make it far more difficult for us to be misled. For example, say that you want
to introduce cameras in the streets, an armed and more authoritarian police
force, and the erosion of personal freedoms. You don't
want the public to oppose these policies, indeed you want them to demand that
you introduce them. What do you need for this to
happen? More high profile, violent crime, which creates
enormous fear in the community. Achieve that and people will be knocking
on your door demanding that you put cameras in their streets and give more guns
and power to the police.
Problem-reaction-solution. And what better way to induce more crime than to create a
society of 'haves' and 'have nots' dependent on welfare payments and then start
dismantling the welfare state? You give people a choice of going without basic
needs or of taking someone else's money and property. And
when they do the latter, the victims of the crime and the mass of the people
who see the reports of the crime demand that "something must be
done".
All aspects of society are being used to promote this mental coup d'état.
The 'education' system is not there to inform children and young people, it is there to indoctrinate them; the same with the
media and advertising. The tax exempt foundations
coordinate the Elites's 'education' policy in the
I included in The Robots' Rebellion an extract from a document found,
apparently by accident, in 1986 called Silent Weapons For A
Quiet War. Another version is reported to have been in
the hands of U.S.Naval Intelligence in 1969. It is a
wonderful explanation of the technique of mass brainwashing. The version I have
was found inside an IBM photocopier bought at a second
hand sale in
"Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent
weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep them undisciplined and
ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them
confused, disorganised, and distracted with matters of no real importance on
the other hand.
This is achieved by:
1. disengaging their minds; sabotaging their
mental activities; providing a low-quality programme of public education in
mathematics; systems design and economics, and discouraging technical creativity.
2. engaging their emotions, increasing their
self indulgence and their indulgence in emotionalphysical
activities by:
a) unrelenting emotional affrontations
and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of a constant barrage of sex,
violence, and wars in the media - especially the TV and the newspapers.
b) giving them what they desire - in excess -
"junk food for thought" - and depriving them of what they really
need.
c) rewriting history and law and subjecting
the public to the deviant creation, thus being able to shift their thinking
from personal needs to highly fabricated outside priorities.
These preclude their interest in, and discovery of, the silent weapons of
social automation technology. The general rule is that there is profit in
confusion; the more confusion, the more profit. Therefore
the best approach is to create problems and then offer solutions.
In summary:
Media:
Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social
issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.
Schools:
Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real
law, and real history.
Entertainment:
Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level.
Work:
Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time
to think; back on the farm with the other animals."
That doesn't describe today's world, does it? All
the main aspects of the coup d'état are there and we can see this strategy at
work every day. When a government is planning to introduce legislation against
a target group as part of the plan to enforce conformity and remove freedoms,
the process of softening up public opinion against that target group through
propaganda and engineered events. When the legislation is
finally presented, the potential opposition is already either greatly
reduced or destroyed altogether.
Take the example of the Criminal Justice Bill introduced by the British
government in 1994. It was a dreadful piece of work and a tremendous strike
against basic freedoms, but it sailed through Parliament with virtually
all-party support. One of its many targets were the
'travellers', the groups of people who live in mobile homes of many kinds and
move between various places throughout the year. They have
been dubbed 'New Age' travellers by the media. The travellers are not
perfect - who is? - but it will be enlightening to
look at how they were treated. In the year to eighteen months before the
Criminal Justice Bill was announced, you could hardly open a newspaper or watch
the TV news without seeing a story which suggested that travellers were a
'problem' in need of a 'solution'. Police were stopping and harassing the
traveller convoys as they moved from site to site; councils were refusing to
allow them to cross their borders; conflicts were breaking out between
travellers and police as the anger and frustration mounted. All was captured and broadcast on the main television news bulletins.
Agents provocateurs connected to British Intelligence were in there stirring up
just as the cameras were on the spot, in the way such agencies operate all over the world.
Once negative events and propaganda have been projected
at public opinion, out go the opinion-polling organisations with their
clipboards. The people who ask the questions on the street don't
know what they are involved in. They are just asking the questions they are told and paid to ask. But
opinion polls are not there to measure public opinion so the people can be
given what they desire. They are there to direct public opinion, often using
loaded questions to attract the desired reply. Tell people that 80% of the
population believe something and those of the sheep - baa, baa - mentality will
quickly conform and believe the same. Eighty per cent of people cannot be
wrong, can they? Oh yes they can, if they have given their minds away.
The other role of opinion polls is to check if the propaganda against a
target group is working. Once the opinion polls say that a sufficient majority
now believe the target group is a problem and "something must be
done", the legislation (the solution) is taken out of
the file and put before Parliament. This approach has another advantage
in that the potential political opposition, what little there is, fears the
electoral consequences of opposing laws to 'solve' a 'problem' about which the
public has now been programmed to believe that "something must be
done". Therefore highly controversial legislation
like the Criminal Justice Bill (which removes basic freedoms) goes through
Parliament and into law virtually on the nod.
Once this Bill was making its way into law, suddenly all the
"travellers are a problem" stories disappeared and at the time of
this writing, have never reappeared. They will only return when even more harsh
legislation against them is being planned. Until then,
public opinion will go on being softened up to accept legislation against other
target groups on the Elite's hit list and the public will go on reacting like
robots in exactly the way required. Unless we choose to take
control of our own minds.
Organisations like the Tavistock Institute of
Human Relations (and their brothers and sisters in the
Many of the so called 'spontaneous' trends that are taken on by the young
are introduced by these and other organisations and then hyped into a frenzy by
advertising and the controlled media. People talk about the "latest
craze" and very few stop to ask, "Where did this
start and who was behind it?" We hear about the "craze that's
sweeping
THE DIVERSION TECHNIQUE
All that I am talking about here comes under the heading of 'diversion'. This is one of the most effective of the mind manipulation weapons
used against the human psyche. It takes many forms. If you are being
held captive, one way to escape is to start a diversion.
It may be an argument or a fight among fellow prisoners. Once the trouble
starts, everyone's attention, including that of the guards, focuses on the
incident. This gives you the opportunity to slip away unseen. The bull-fighter's technique is another obvious form of
diversion as he focuses the attention of the bull on his cape, so allowing
himself to avoid injury.
In the world of propaganda and public mind manipulation, we are constantly being subjected to this. Accusations
of anti-Semitism against New World Order investigators is a classic
example of diversion. You concentrate attention on the issue of the messenger's
alleged racism and divert attention from what he or she is saying about their
research. We have the strategy of infiltrating 'moderate' wings of political
parties while covertly following an extreme game plan. This is a diversion which stops extremists being identified while
they, themselves, denounce their legitimate opposition as extremists. We hear
from time to time of 'revelations' about intelligence agencies, gut how many
are real revelations and how many are systematically leaked to divert people
from what is really going on?
An example: publish a book by a 'spy' who names certain people as foreign
agents. Hype it up through your controlled media and
get the government to vehemently oppose it, so adding to its credibility.
Persuade people to accept that the names revealed by the 'whistle-blower' are
correct and those who were really involved are in the
clear. If you want to introduce controversial legislation or a government is being forced to reveal unpleasant information about
itself, then under the rules of diversion, this should be done on a day you
know another major story is going to break. This lessens the space and prominence
given to what you say because of the massive media coverage of the other big
story.
On the day the British Home Secretary, Michael Howard, announced the
introduction of identity cards, the Loyalist Paramilitary groups in Northern
Ireland announced a ceasefire in line with the one agreed by the Republican
IRA. This reduced by a tremendous amount, the coverage and reaction in the
media to Michael Howard's identity cards. I do not believe this was a
coincidence, especially since the paramilitaries and the British government are
in regular contact through the secret society network and other channels, no
matter what they may say publicly. Indeed, the secret communication between the
IRA and their 'enemy', the British government, has been
publicly exposed.
The attempts to blame two Libyans for the bomb on Pan Am Flight 103 which killed 270 people at
This murder was blamed on the staff at the Libyan
People's Bureau. In fact she was shot by a CIA marksman
for
Despite this information and the fact that no evidence points to an
involvement by
There was no talk of monsters and terrorism in 1988 when the USS Vincennes
fired a missile 'by accident' to shoot down an Iranian passenger jet with 290
on board. The
The stepping-stones strategy is another diversion. The Elite know the goal
they are aiming for and the stepping-stones required to manipulate public
opinion towards that end. But if they are going to
persuade people to accept those stepping stones, each one must be presented in
isolation. If once they are seen by the general public
as links in a chain leading towards a global centralised tyranny, obviously the
game is up.
If you want barcoded human beings linked to a
central computer, you must first get them to accept credit and identity cards. You
can be even more subtle by announcing first of all
that the identity cards will not be compulsory, as Michael Howard did at the
Conservative Party Conference in 1994. Shouts of dismay from
the audience who want them to be compulsory make you look positively moderate
in comparison, and initial opposition from the civil liberties groups is
diluted because the government says, "But they are not compulsory and then
go on to barcoding, but the stepping-stones
diversionary approach demands that this be done in distinct stages, so that
people in general don't realise what is going on. These tactics are used at all levels of society.
If you want to develop an area of unspoilt, isolated land, and you announce
plans to build a housing estate or industrial complex, it would attract
enormous opposition. Instead, the first stage is to propose a road to allow
people greater 'access' to the area. Once this has been achieved
a few buildings begin to appear, then more and more, until you have built, in
stages, what you intended all along. This is one reason why the information in
this book and others like it is so important. Once you know the ultimate aims,
the stepping-stones towards them become so easy to see.
THE 'FREE' PRESS
None of this mind manipulation could happen without the media. Again, only a
few people in the media know they are playing a key role in programming the
human mind to walk the road to a global tyranny. The overwhelming majority of
journalists have no idea how they are being used. I
would go further. From my experience inside the media for many years and more
recently on the other side of the microphone and notebook, I believe the two
least knowledgeable and streetwise professions - in general - are journalism
and politics. As I suggested earlier, they are two aspects of the same
illusion.
The politicians act as if they rule the world and the media report events as
if politicians are the global decision makers. Thus, the real controllers can
stay in the shadows, unreported and unidentified. There are exceptions when you
meet a very bright journalist who can see behind the façades. They know they
are imprisoned within a media structure which severely
limits what they can say and do. But they take every
opportunity to get across as much information as they can. I have met a few of
those people and they're a joy to talk to. If only that were true of the rest. Most journalists on
local and regional papers and local radio are either time-servers, who are programmed to turn out the same old establishment line
without question while thinking their years in the profession make them
streetwise, or they are youngsters fresh out of university who have no
experience of the world and the manipulation that goes on. There are, I stress,
exceptions, but I am speaking generally here. I don't
say this out of condemnation, but as this mindset stands between the events in
the world and the way the information about them is communicated to the public,
it is important that we know the nature of the filters and the filtering that
goes on.
I remember talking in
At the national and international level, the number of journalists knowingly
manipulating the human mind is far greater than the local and regional media,
but it is still a relative few. The rest just conform to the traditional
structure and approach and allow themselves to be
manipulated to manipulate their audience. I worked in BBC Television national
newsroom for years and everyone around me appeared to be extremely genuine.
Most of them were very nice people who loved their children and would not wish
them to face a centralised global dictatorship. But
every day they turn out stories which feed millions of viewers the line the
Elite want them to see and hear.
To manipulate the world, you don't need to have
people running around all the time, like one of those stage performers trying
to keep a dozen plates spinning on the end of a stick. Once you have created
the structure, anyone coming into that organisation, say a newspaper or
television newsroom, has to conform to what is already there. If you can get
your representatives into the positions which appoint
others into that organisation, it is even better, because you can then fill the
place with clones of your own attitudes.
Also, journalists are there to report events. If
you can engineer significant events, the journalists will report them. You don't have to control every journalist to do this; the event
will be reported anyway. Most of the time, the background information and
explanation of that event will come from official sources. Watch a television
news bulletin today if you can, and see where the words the reporter is
speaking are overwhelmingly coming from: official sources. So without even
manipulation a single journalist, your engineered event, be
it a "terrorist bomb" or "economic problem", is both
reported and explained in the way you want.
The coverage of the horrific bombing in
When you are looking at the news, make a note of how short the individual
items are. There is usually only enough time, even in major stories, to say
this is what has happened and this is the (official) explanation. I was laughed
at by millions when I questioned that the figure I was seeing on the television
news was the real Saddam Hussein back in 1991. There was this man on the screen
and the reporter or newsreader was saying it was Saddam. We were
told whom he had met that day, and, on one occasion, how he had swum
across a river to show his people he was alive and well after the Gulf War. Now
we know from a defector from
But there are some journalists in strategic
positions who do know and support what those organisations are doing. The media
is such a vehicle for the coup d'état that if it ever got into the hands of the
Elite, the potential would be limitless. But we don't
have to worry because, as we are told so often, we have an independent media. Ummm. Independent of what and whom? In the August/September 1993
edition of the Netherland's based magazine, Exposure,
details were published of the controlling boards of
the three television networks in the
The Exposure research came from the work of the American New World Order
investigator, Eustace Mullins. From what I read, Eustace and I would have very
little in common on most things, but either the people he names were
controlling the networks at the time of the article, or they were not. The
following is provable fact: the NBC is a subsidiary
of RCA, a media conglomerate which appears regularly
on the career details of a number of people named throughout this book. Among the NBC directors named in the
Mullins article were: John Brademas, a director of
the Rockefeller Foundation; Peter G. Peterson, former head of Kuhn, Loeb, and
Co. (Rothschild), and a former Secretary of Commerce; Robert Cizik, chairman of RCA and of First City Bancorp, which was
identified in Congressional testimony as a Rothschild bank; Thomas O. Paine,
president of Northrup Co. (the big defence
contractor) and director of the (Elite-controlled) Institute of Strategic
Studies in London; Donald Smiley, a director of two Morgan Companies,
Metropolitan Life and U.S. Steel; Thornton Bradshaw, chairman of RCA, director
of Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Atlantic Richfield Oil, and the Aspen Institute
of Humanistic Studies (both of the latter headed by 'environmentalists' and
elite Bilderberger, Robert O. Anderson). Clearly the NBC board has
considerable Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan influence.
Another American TV network, ABC, had on its board of
directors: Ray Adam, director of J.P. Morgan, Metropolitan Life (Morgan), and
Morgan Guaranty Trust; Frank Cary, chairman of IBM, and director of M.P. Morgan and Morgan Guaranty Trust; Donald C. Cook,
general partner of Lazard Freres
banking house; John T. Connor of the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Gravath, Swaine and Moore, former
Assistant Secretary of the Navy, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, director of the
Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), General Motors, and chairman of
the J. Henry Schroder Bank and Schroders
Inc, of London (see the funding of Hitler); Thomas M. Macioce,
director of Manufacturers Hanover Trust (Rothschild); George Jenkins, chairman
of Metropolitan Life (Morgan) and Citibank (which has many Rothschild
connections); Martin J. Schwab, director of Manufacturers Hanover (Rothschild);
Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve, director of J.P. Morgan,
Morgan Guaranty Trust, Hoover Institution, Time magazine, and General Foods; Ulric Haynes Jr, director of the
Ford Foundation and Marine Midland Bank (owned by the Hong Kong and Shanghai
Bank).
Again, we see the same Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan lineup
on the board of the ABC network which, we are told, is
independent of NBC. The ABC company
was taken over by Cities Communications, whose most prominent director is
Robert Roosa, senior partner of Brown Brothers
Harriman, which has close ties with the Bank of England. Roosa
and David Rockefeller are credited with selecting Paul
Volcker to chair the Federal Reserve Board.
Which brings us to CBS, the third of the 'independent'
networks. Its financial expansion was supervised for a
long time by Brown Brothers Harriman and its senior partner, Prescott Bush who
was a CBS director. CBS banks through the Morgan Guaranty Trust and
reports of CBS connections with the CIA and British Intelligence are legion
among New World Order researchers.
Some know it as the Conspiracy Brainwashing System. On the
CBS board are: William S. Paley, the chairman (for
whom Prescott Bush personally organised the money to buy the company); Harold
Brown, executive director of the Trilateral Commission, and former Secretary of
the Air Force and Defence; Roswell Gilpatric, from
the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Cravath, Swaine, and Moore, and former director of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York; Henry B. Schnacht, director
of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), the Council on Foreign
Relations, Brookings Institution, and Committee for Economic Development;
Michel C. Bergerac, chairman of Revlon, and director of Manufacturers Hanover
Bank (Rothschild); James D, Wolfensohn, former head
of J. Henry Shcroder Bank, who has close links with
the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, (in 1995, Bill
Clinton successfully nominated him to head the World Bank); Franklin A. Thomas,
head of the Ford Foundation; Newton D. Minow,
director of the Rand Corporation and, among many others. the Ditchley Foundation, which is
closely linked with the Tavistock Institute in
Again with CBS, we are looking at the same names at
the helm, and all three networks are closely interlocked with the Council on
Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. How can it
possibly be claimed that the three television networks in
Look at the potential for recruiting only those producers, journalists, and
editors who support your views and aims, and for sacking those who challenge
your interference in what is and isn't shown. Look at
the potential for selling a common line on events and news stories to ensure
the American people have no other explanations than those you want them to
believe. In July 1995, ABC was merged with the Walt Disney empire
and the giant Westinghouse Electric made its move to buy CBS. The concentration
of power gathers pace.
The same familiar elites control the three television networks and
The mind manipulation possibilities this offers are just incredible. Scores
of leading
The leading 'quality' newspaper in the
A former editor-in-chief and board member at The Daily Telegraph is Andrew
Knight, another member of the Bilderberg Group
Steering Committee and the Ditchley Foundation, and
formerly of The Economist magazine (director, Evelyn de Rothschild), a
publication set up to press for an end to the Corn laws and promote the
principle of 'free trade'. Knight moved on to become executive chairman of Rupert Murdoch's News International which owns
The Sun, Today, The News of the World, and The Time and Sunday Times. Murdoch
owns newspapers, magazines, and television networks that are
estimated to have a potential audience of three billion people. That is
without his interests in the film industry. He is now linking in with a global
telephone and communications network, MCI, and has made a bid for parts of the
vast Berlusconi media empire in
It is not the front men we need to look at so much as who
is behind them pulling their strings. It is they who
make the money available and manipulate the politicians to allow great media
takeovers and cartels to emerge. With unbelievable hypocrisy, Conrad Black's
Daily Telegraph said of Murdoch's domain: "This is a huge and potentially
dangerous concentration of media power..." And
the Telegraph owner's empire is not?
The controlled media can feed the same basic messages to the public and
hypnotise the collective mind to accept them. And if
the same messages are coming from apparently unconnected media outlets, it must
be true because "they are all saying it". Just as we have a One Party
political state, so we have a
The least radical newspaper in
When I started to have more and more success in making this suppressed information
available to the public, the campaign to discredit me was
stepped up. I was delighted in a way, because it proved I am twitching a
few nerve ends among those who wish to control the human kind. The Jewish
Chronicle, which parrots words like freedom and truth, began to write
outrageous misrepresentations of what I am saying and doing. I was having
conversations with the press officer of the Board of Deputies of British Jews -
a lovely woman - who was speaking to one David Icke,
while she was reading about a very different David Icke
in the Jewish Chronicle. Understandably she was
confused. I wasn't because what was happening was so
predictable. The sight of a paper like the Chronicle, posturing
its morality while lying through its teeth is not a pretty one.
However, it was the Guardian, the daily house magazine of the Robot Radical mindset, that I found most interesting. One of its
'reporters', a Paul Brown, arrived at a meeting in
But what is it the Illuminati
Protocols say?
"All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions -
aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical - for so long, of
course, as the constitution exists...Like the Indian idol, Vishnu, they will
have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of
the public opinions required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an
excited patient loses all power of judgement and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating our opinion or
any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are
following the organ of their party, they will in fact follow the flag which we
hang out for them." Protocol 12
And most journalists, probably including Mr Brown,
will not have a clue about how they are being used. Someone wrote to me who had
read The Robots' Rebellion and was a daily reader of The Guardian because he
thought it had the integrity that others lacked. He was stunned to read Brown's
article, which he said was a gross misrepresentation of what I am saying and
doing. "I thought I could trust The Guardian"
he said. You can't. You can't
trust any of them. From where do the public get their information about
political parties at election time? The controlled media.
If the media will not support you, or are vehemently against you, it is
virtually impossible to be elected. If you are a
politician looking to win or stay in power, you have to listen to what the
media is demanding. If you don't, they will turn
against you and even reveal some unpleasant information which they have long
known about, but have kept under wraps while you were playing their game. When
Rupert Murdoch began to make positive statements about the British Labour
leader Tony Blair (Bil) following the 'untimely' and
sudden death of his predecessor, John Smith, this was
considered highly significant for Blair's chances of becoming prime
minister. The sad thing is that it was.
The media have to keep the banks and advertisers happy. That's
where the power really lies. The Global Elite pyramid coordinates major
advertisers into pressurising papers into following or not following, a
particular weapon. But, of course, we have the media
'watchdogs' which are there to protect us from media abuse. The chairman of the newspaper 'watchdog', the Press Complaints
Commission, is Lord Wakeham, the former cabinet
minister, who controversially went from government to the board of N.M.
Rothschild. And while Lord Rees Mogg
(Bil), the former editor of The Times, was chairman
of the television and radio 'watchdog', the Broadcasting Complaints Commission,
he was also a Rothschilds' director, Sir Zelman
Cowan, another former chairman of the old complaints body, the Press Council,
was involved in 1991 with the takeover of the Australian Fairfax Group by
Conrad Black's Hollinger Group. Lord Armstrong, the former head of the
Civil Service and cabinet secretary (who went on to become a director of N.M.
Rothschild) also joined the board of Carlton Television, which broadcasts to
I could go on and on across the
"There is no such thing as a free press. You know it and I know
it. There is not one of you who would dare to write his
honest opinions. The business of the journalist is to destroy truth, to
lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell
himself, his country, and his race, for his daily bread. We are tools and
vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the
strings, we dance; our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are the
property of these men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
But here again, we come back to the same theme. The
media is our creation. It reflects the collective mind of humanity and if it
did not, it could not survive and prosper as it does. We can debate which came
first, the collective mind's attitudes or the programming of those attitudes,
but if you read the average tabloid newspaper and then spend an hour in the
average bar, you will see that the thought patterns of the paper and the people
are largely the same. Vast numbers of people think and act like a tabloid
newspaper. They have allowed themselves to become tabloid thinkers with tabloid
minds. We now have tabloid radio and tabloid television, too, which follows
from the success of the tabloid newspapers. They all want it short, incredibly
superficial, and with each item full of either mockery,
condemnation, instant judgements, the official line, and/or defence of the
status quo. Oh yes, and if you can get lots of tits and bums in there at every
opportunity, so much the better, because women are only her to lust after.
Have I just described the content of a tabloid newspaper or the content of a
conversation you will hear in almost any bar when 'the lads' get together? Both. And that's the point. Those
thought patterns in the collective mind created the reality we call the media.
Tabloid newspapers reflect, and programme, the thoughts of great tracts of
humanity in an ever-downward spiral. The more our thoughts are
programmed, the more open we become to even more severe programming. The
media wont change until the collective mind changes
and that will result only from changes in individual thinking. We create our
own reality and the media is no different.
Whatever dominates the thought patterns of the collective mind will be the
physical reality. The human race in general want someone else to do their
thinking for them, and they have allowed their minds to close to the point
where they do not want to discuss anything that isn't superficial or full of
mockery and instant judgements of others. Hence the
media we have today. We have thought that into existence, too. When we change,
it will change.
MASS HYPNOSIS
The media's greatest effect on the human mind is not so much its detail, but
the mass hypnosis created by the same basic themes occurring over
and over. Most people don't pick up detail from newspapers, let alone
the broadcast media where you get one chance to hear something and there is no
way you can go back and hear it again, let alone extract more detail from it.
These themes include the criteria for how we should judge ourselves
and each other; for what is credible or incredible, sane or insane. This
background bombardment of our subconscious with a common 'party line' of
information plays a major part in the way the conscious and subconscious sees
itself and the world. As a result, we are allowing the sum total of the media
to programme our thought patterns and create our reality.
I learned so much about this process when I was the focus of unbelievable
national ridicule in the early 1990s. Most of what the media said about me was
100% the opposite of what I was saying and writing, but the people
overwhelmingly believed what the media told them and I was ridiculed by
millions for things I wasn't saying and didn't
believe. This is happening to other people every day. The mass hypnosis has
also turned millions into spectators of the world, rather than participants. We
allow others to do, while we observe and sit in the stand, watching the few
play the game which decides the future of the human
race...our human race. This is symbolised by sport, and the endless television
soaps in which we are spectators of the manufactured lives of overwhelming
cardboard, one-dimensional characters. We often live their lives instead of our
own. I love sport and there are soaps that I enjoy, too, but the danger comes
when that is all we have in our lives.
As one of the Illuminati Protocols said in the
1800s:
"In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are
about we further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions,
people's palaces...Soon we shall begin through the press to propose
competitions in art, in sport of all kinds: these interests will finally distract
their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to
oppose them. Growing more and more unaccustomed to reflect and form any
opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we,
because we alone shall be offering them new directions of thought...of course
through such persons as will not be suspected of solidarity with us."
Protocol 13
We think of hypnotism only in terms of a single person lying down on a couch
and listening to the words of a hypnotist speaking softly into the ear. Or we may think of the stage hypnotist who has a group of
people doing silly things in front of a guffawing audience. Some even demand
that this should be banned because it is dangerous.
These are obvious forms of hypnosis. But we don't
realise that we are subtly being hypnotised and encouraged to do and think
silly things every day of our lives. Instead of lying on the couch listening to
the soft words of the hypnotist, we sit in the chair listening to newsreaders,
film stars, advertising voice overs, and sundry
presenters. The messages pound our conscious and subconscious mind and we are
programmed to think the way the controllers who own
the media, the banks, the drub companies, the armament companies, the oil
companies, ad infinitum, want us to think. Is there anyone left reading this book who still believes that the idea of a global
conspiracy with the tiny few controlling the vast majority is a fantasy, and
impossible? Surely not.
The esoteric knowledge about the nature of the human psyche is used to great
effect. While those in the spiritual movement are laughed at for their
explanations of the human mind-spirit, this same knowledge is
being used by the manipulators to covertly hypnotise us and program our
subconscious. Doctor Wilson Bryan Key, a professor of journalism, made a
study of these techniques and wrote three books, Media Sexploitation, The Clam
Plate Orgy, and Subliminal Seduction. He discovered that millions of dollar are
being spent by advertisers for the subliminal [programming of the subconscious]
manipulation and indoctrination of audiences. Dr Key revealed the existence of
the Tachistoscope, a film projector with a high speed
shutter which flashes messages every five seconds for 1/3000th of a second.
These messages could not be seen by the naked eye, but
were absorbed by the subconscious. The message would then filter down from the
subconscious to the conscious level as a thought, desire, or opinion, which the
person believes is their own. Years ago, a flash-frame picture of a Coca-Cola
bottle used to be inserted into a cinema film just
before the interval. The audience couldn't see it, but
their subconscious could. Sales of Coca-Cola during cinema intervals went up
significantly.
Through the 1950s and 60s the experimentation into this subliminal
interaction with the subconscious expanded rapidly. In 1962 and 1966, Doctor
Hal C. Becker patented subliminal devices which
increased the potential of such technology. He operated a successful weight
reduction clinic in
Some years ago there was a furore in
If they can make more people buy bottles of Coca-Cola with these techniques,
why can't they make more people vote for the party and
the candidate they want? They can. Of course they can.
And given what you have read up to now, do you think
they would use that potential to manipulate the public minds or would they
refuse to do that because it was undemocratic? Once the technology and the
knowledge is available, there is nothing that can't be
communicated to the subconscious through this technique of mass hypnosis.
Once more, we come back to the esoteric knowledge. The manipulators know how
the psyche works and how it is possible to programme responses without the
conscious level of awareness knowing it is happening. The technology now exists
which can be set up near a television or radio transmitter and will send out messages which lock in to the wavelength of the television broadcast
as a 'carrier wave', a carrier of the subliminal message. These subliminal
messages are coming out of the television set without even the television
station knowing it is happening. The messages can tell people how to vote, who they should love and who they should hate, what they
should buy, and what they should think. Say you want to start a riot. Send out
subliminal messages to the area for a while, and then produce one or two agents provocateurs and an event to focus anger. In no time
you will have the people, already primed subliminally, going absolutely
crazy. Then you say you need more power for the police and the military
to 'solve' this 'problem'.
The television has become the greatest tool of mind manipulation and it
starts with children only a few years old. Some researchers believe children
are especially susceptible to this form of programming. Most people watch the
television as if mesmerised by the screen. Conversation is
destroyed. Instead of talking to people, we are talked
at by the television set. Our lives are conditioned by
the themes and indoctrination pouring from the screen. We are told what is right and wrong, good and bad, success and
failure, in and out. It is our resident hypnotist in the corner of the room.
Many people fall asleep in front of the television because their minds are bombarded to the point of overload by the incessant flow
of opinions and information. What does a hypnotist do before he or she begins
to make those subconscious suggestions? They put their clients into a state of
relaxation, a dozy half-sleep, because that is when the conscious mind is quiet
and the subconscious can be most effectively accessed.
What better way, therefore, to programme television viewers with subliminal
messages than to have them half asleep in the chair. In fact, people could even be put into that state by the subliminal messages
coming from the set.
And what is the real effect of the computer games
and virtual reality technology that turns some children into zombies? Virtual reality
is a good name because the whole system is designed to
encourage the human race to accept a virtual reality and call it life. Dr
Wilson Bryan Key, the investigator of these matters, said that subliminal
technology can so affect many people that they can be
programmed to start eating and drinking too much, change their sexual habits,
and embark on an almost endless list of other manifestations of extreme
behaviour. The subconscious is programmed with thought
patterns and it creates that physical reality. These techniques are becoming
more sophisticated and developed all the time. Susan Bryce highlighted one
development in her article in Exposure magazine in the June/July 1993 issue:
"Data on the relationship between heartbeats and suggestibility
reveals that music or voice timed to the rhythm of the human heart of 72 pulses
per minute, can affect human behaviour...Experimental commercials prepared
using 72 beats per minute as pacing for drumbeats, music and voice have been
tested in a special theatre with a random audience of housewives and husbands.
The advertisement was for a new analgesic [headache potion]. Results showed
that had the analgesic commercial been broadcast to the roughly 30 million
people watching NBC Evening News, five million would
have developed headaches within three hours of viewing it."
The technology has been developed to send out
messages as microwaves and extremely low frequency waves (ELFs)
which can speak to the mass subconscious and cause physical illness. It is
important to appreciate that the knowledge held secretly about the human mind
and body is far more advanced than anything we are
allowed to see in the public arena. Again, it is part of the "need to
know" policy. If someone has knowledge and technology
which most people do not realise exists, the potential for manipulation
is enormous. The esoteric knowledge passed through the secret society network
across the years has been a major factor in the creation of this two-speed
science. The public is told about a limited and intentionally flawed science which goes back to Darwin and others, while the fare
more advanced version remains hidden.
The mind-spirit, the eternal part of us, is a series of interconnecting and
interacting magnetic energy fields. These react with other magnetic energy
fields and this is why people who live under electricity power lines are more
prone to certain illnesses. The electromagnetic field thrown out by the power
lines imbalances the magnetic mind-spirit of the people living nearby. This
imbalance is passed through the multiple levels of our
being to the physical body where it manifests as cancer or some other disease.
It can also directly affect cellular functioning to create physical illness.
Therefore, if the manipulators can broadcast waves at certain frequencies, they
can imbalance our cellular and non-physical magnetic levels and cause physical,
mental, and emotional illness.
Former FBI agent, Ted Gunderson, has said that magnetic radioactive discs have long been used covertly as cancer-inducing "silent
killers" to remove unwanted politicians and others. These can cause cancers which grow at astonishing speeds. Experiments on the
effects of ILF waves and chemical warfare substances are routinely carried out on unsuspecting populations around
the world. We hear about these things on the news with reports of a
"strange and unexplained plague/disease" which has broken out over a
small area of a country. I am told that an area of
Some people find it hard to believe that messages can be
broadcast to the subconscious. But what is
television and radio? They are words and pictures which
are broadcast in wave form and decoded back into words and pictures by
technology. When you think of the advanced knowledge that is secretly known
about the nature of the human brain/psyche, is it too much of a mental leap to
see that it is possible to broadcast messages on wavelengths designed to
communicate with the subconscious? In fact, as I
explain at length in The Robots' Rebellion, the existence of such technology is
provable.
Experiments have shown that if people are subjected
to these waves for little more than a minute, they begin to react as the
messages tell them to. In their minds, these messages appear to be their own
thoughts, when in reality they are tuning into wavelengths broadcast from
outside of their psyche. In such a situation, these people are fully-paid-up robots.
Two such techniques are called Radio Hypnotic
Intracerebral Control and Electronic Dissolution of Memory. Researchers say
that these can remotely induce an hypnotic trance,
deliver suggestions, and erase all memory of both the instructions and whatever
it is the person has done in response to those instructions. What a tool if you
want to assassinate a 'troublemaker'; create some terrible event to discredit a
group or person; abduct someone and blame it on 'aliens'; or produce a
problem-reaction-solution situation. In 1975, the journalist James Moore
claimed to have secured a 350-page manual on the subject from CIA sources. Part
of that document said:
"Medically, these radio signals are directed at certain parts of
the brain. When a part of your brain receives a tiny electrical impulse from
outside sources, such as vision, hearing, etc, an emotion is
produced - anger at the sight of a gang of boys beating an old woman,
for example. The same emotion of anger can be created
by artificial radio signals sent to your brain by a controller. You could
instantly feel the same white hot anger without any apparent reason.!
It makes you wonder about some of the messages being
received by mediums and channellers.
Psychically sensitive people are consciously tuning into other wavelengths of
reality. It is possible, indeed probable, that some are tuning into wavelengths
broadcast from technology on this planet. In the world of secret science, they
know it is possible for chanellers to communicate
with other wavelengths of reality. They know how it is done
and they use mediums/channellers in their experiment.
According to the books on the mind control and advanced science
establishment at Montauk in the
PROJECT MKULTRA
Alongside the development of mass mind control techniques have come those
aimed at specific individuals. The most notorious is the MKUltra
programme run by the CIA. Other offshoots and variations on this have been
programmes known as Bluebird, Artichoke, MKDelta, and
MKNaomi. Their even more advanced successors still go
on today and the victims have often hit the global headlines as 'lone
assassins'. MKUltra began in the 1950s under the
Canadian-based Scottish psychiatrist, Doctor Ewen
Cameron, who became a close friend of CIA chief Allen Dulles after Cameron
served as the Canadian/United States psychiatrist at the
Under the supervision of people like the Dulles brothers and other members
of the
The CIA was formed out of the wartime
The 'verbal agreement' wouldn't have anything to do
with the danger of written evidence seeping out and blowing the story, I
suppose. Writer and researcher, Noam Chomsky, says
that Gehlen set up a secret U.S.-Nazi army, which
extended it operations to
The CIA, under Allen Dulles, funded psychiatrist Ewen
Cameron from the early 1950s on, as documents released in 1977 under the U.S. Freedom
of Information Act have confirmed. Most of the documents were
destroyed or not released, but there were enough to offer just a glimpse
of the nightmare that was MKUltra. The project
included the use of drugs (like LSD) and grotesque mind manipulation techniques
known as 'depatterning' and 'psychic driving'. The
CIA admitted supporting research into human mind and behaviour control at 150
institutions and these included hospitals, prisons, drug companies, and 44
universities. At least 185 scientists were involved. Like the Nazis'
experiments, the targets were largely those considered 'lesser human beings'
such as prostitutes, foreigners, people with non-white skins, and drug addicts.
Thousands of prisoners were also forced to take part,
and hospital and mental patients were used without their consent as
experiment-fodder for these crazy people. Let no-one
tell me this is not still happening today all over the world, including the
The CIA funded Ewen Cameron through an
organisation called the Society for Human Ecology, yet another CIA front, which
was connected to
"Physical control of brain functions is a demonstrated fact...it
is even possible to create and follow intentions, the development of thoughts
and visual experiences. By electrical stimulation of specific cerebral
structures, movements can be induced by radio command, hostility may appear and
disappear, social hierarchy can be modified, sexual behaviour may be changed,
and memory, emotions, and the thinking process may be influenced by remote
control...".
Speaking in 1966, Delgado said that his experiments "...support the
distasteful conclusion that motion, emotion, and behaviour can be directed by
electrical forces and that humans can be controlled like robots by push
buttons".
Which is precisely what happened to the killers of people
like John Lennon, the would-be assassin of President Reagan, and, almost
certainly, the assassin of King Feisal of
LSD was widely used in the Cameron experiments. It creates confusion, a key
aspect of mind control. One of the early victims was Frank Olsen, a chemist
specialising in air-borne disease. He was given LSD
while suffering from "depression and paranoia" and two weeks later
threw himself to his death from the window of a
In the Observer magazine of
One of Cameron's techniques links in with what I said earlier. He used a
tape machine called the Cererophone which was placed under the pillow of the sleeping victims
to repeat messages over and over. He would also record a key phrase used by the
victim became obsessed with the phrase and could not think about anything else.
Such was the emotional result that drugs would be used
to sedate the person. Psychic driving, the input of the
"new" personality, often followed electro-therapy, the destruction of
the natural personality. This was called the
"depatterning" process.
Cameron used a technique called the Page-Russell shock treatment, named
after the two British doctors who developed it. The victims would be given an
initial electric shock, followed by five to nine smaller ones, two or three
times a day for up to thirty days. Hospital workers at the time have reported
that the screaming echoed around the hospital. The 'patients' would try to
escape from this horror. Once this depatterning was completed and the victim thoroughly confused, a helmet
would be clamped on their heads and negative messages would be repeated into
the victim's mind for maybe twenty hours a day. These messages would repeat
phrases like "My mother hates me, my husband hates me, I am a
failure", and so on, using recordings of the victim's own voice. Cameron
would also wire their legs and give them an electric shock after the completion
of each message.
With the old personality now destroyed, the process would
be used to build a new one in Cameron's image. And this, lest we forget,
was funded by the CIA with taxpayers' money at the behest of Allen Dulles, the
man who , with others, controlled the Nuremberg War
Trials that sentenced scores of lower-ranked Nazis to death for doing far less
than he and Cameron were doing. All of this continues in a much more advanced
way today. I have been told of mind control research
of a similar kind in some
Most people have no idea how easy the law makes it for you to be imprisoned in a mental institution. It really is so easy.
A friend of mine who was going through a traumatic spiritual awakening (he was
seeing the world for what it really is) was pressured
by his family to agree to attend a private mental hospital. He chose to go for
their sake. But when he decided to leave the hospital
after chatting with the doctors, he was forcibly stopped. He was
also forced to take drugs. What the staff of that
hospital were doing was perfectly legal. Once you agree to have
treatment at such a place, you lose all your rights to leave if the staff decide that you should not. As the doctors at that
level of the profession largely have no idea about the nature of the psyche,
despite being called 'psychiatrists', they can
imprison you and force you to take drugs to 'treat' quite natural phenomena.
If we are not vigilant, the excuse of 'mental illness' will
be used to intern those who say they can communicate with other
frequencies ['schizophrenia'] and those who claim there is a global conspiracy
['paranoia']. Someone like me who talks about both becomes a 'paranoid
schizophrenic', which is exactly how they imprisoned dissenters in the
psychiatric hospitals of the
Eventually, at the start of the Bush presidency, the CIA settled out of
court with nine of the victims of MKUltra for the
largest sum of money possible without the approval of the Attorney General.
Another 69 are still battling for compensation. This is not
helped by the admission of Richard Helms, the CIA chief at the time of
Watergate, that he destroyed most of the MKUltra
documents in 1973. What we are looking at here is the sharp end of the policy
to turn the human race from unique and free-thinking
expressions of creation into a herd of sheep and robots. It is a combination of
technology, engineered events, and control of both politics and (crucially) the
media. Behind it is the familiar roll call.
The document Silent Weapons For A Quiet War reveals
the input of the Rockefeller Foundation in funding research through
This prospect is nothing new. CIA psychologist Dr José Delgado said in 1966
that the day would come when brain control could be turned
over to non-human operators, by establishing two-way communication
between the implanted brain and a computer. In the 1970s,
"...behavioural technology...in the
Throughout the Silent Weapons document and the Elite philosophy in general, we
see the desire to do exactly that. We see the theme of the chosen elite
controlling the 'stupid herd' in all areas of our lives. It starts with the
children in the schools and the young people in the universities. Get 'em young
and you have got them for good.
I never cease to wonder when I speak at universities how the majority of
students are already programmed to think like clones
of the system by the age of seventeen and eighteen. Their inability to think
for themselves is quite stunning, with very honourable exceptions. Silent
Weapons For A Quiet War emphasises to its own agents
the importance of controlling what children and young people are told. The
teachers are trained to think in a certain way and to
believe that the information they are communicating is true. Even if they doubt
it, the authorities insist that it is taught anyway.
"If you don't like it Mr or Mrs Teacher, get out and we will replace you
with someone who will do as they are told." As the rock group, Pink Floyd,
say in their well-known song, children are programmed
by the education system to be "Just another brick in the wall". But how much debate goes on about these matters?
Teachers, parents, the teaching unions, and the politicians go on endlessly
about the funding of schools and the shortage of school books.
Where is the concern about what is actually taught in
the schools and what is written in those books? And yet
there is no other subject on Earth that is more important than the programming
of the human mind. From that all else comes.
The Silent Weapons document describes the mind-controlling technique
brilliantly.
It says of the Quiet War:
"It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data
processing, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun;
operated by a computer programmer, instead of a marksman; under the orders of a
banking magnate, instead of a military general. It makes no obvious physical or
mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social
life.
"Yet it makes an unmistakable 'noise', causes unmistakable
physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life,
i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for. The
public cannot comprehend the weapon, and therefore cannot believe they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon.
"The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but
because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their
feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore,
they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with
others to defend themselves against it.
"When a silent weapon is applied gradually, the public
adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their
lives until the pressure [psychological via economic] becomes too great and
they crack up. Therefore the silent weapon is a type
of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the
individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking
their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and
emotional strengths and weaknesses."
In other words, divide and rule, and introduce your global dictatorship via
the stepping-stones approach and few will realise what is really going on until
it is too late. In fact, many will even laugh at or condemn those who point out
what is happening. Well the readers of this book, and many others like it, do
know what is really going on. And if we are truly
committed to a better world and to freedom of thought and expression, the
information is impossible to ignore. The work we all have to do to break the
hold the programmers have on so many human minds is considerable, but it is
perfectly achievable - and will be achieved - if we
are prepared to get involved. There is nothing more powerful than a human mind
determined to think and act for itself. Such a phenomenon is a manipulator's
nightmare and, like everyone on this planet, you have the power.
You only have to use it.