www.attention-span.net

 

 











- INTRODUCTION
- PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION

- PROPAGANDA
- Model of Tchakhotine
- strategic Propaganda
- tactical Propaganda

- MISINFORMATION
- signs
- operations
- channels
- Objects of the misinformation

- ACTIVE MEASUREMENTS
- Assassination and intoxication
- subversion

- The PLANNING Of PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION
- CONCLUSION
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- APPENDIX 1

Acceuil


MISINFORMATION


The misinformation is the most complex technique, but also most difficult to classify. It can be used as action in oneself or as support with another action that it is in an offensive or defensive way. This concept comes from the Russian word dezinformatzia which meant in the Russian encyclopaedia of 1947 (see Durandin, 1993)"the use of the freedom of press to handle the masses" (p.17). Montifroi (1994) defines it as the use deliberated on information with an aim of distorting the perception of reality for the target. It aims either misleading the antagonist or at influencing the public opinion or by leading the target to include/understand certain beliefs which they would differently have in aversion or or to assert a lie like véridique(Montifroy, 1994). For Durandin (1993) it is about a lie organized in the intention to mislead the target in favour of the foreign politics of the transmitter at one time or the means of diffusion of information are omni-powerful.

Vorkoff (1986) pushes further while affirming than any information has a content of misinformation by than the individual is unable to reach exactitude in his perceptions and than each individual has a relative appreciation of the importance of the things. Information has two elements: contents of information and its source. There are lie, and thus misinformation, when one of these two elements misses integrity (Durandin, 1993).

The misinformation as action aims mainly the world opinion and/or the opinion of a population by the use of media of mass, but not the leaders (Volkoff, 1986). The handling of the leaders is done via the public opinion (Durandin, 1993). Misinformation as support aims at reinforcing the effect of the other psychological actions either by increasing their impact or or by supporting their clandestine character. It is significant to note that the misinformation can also be used for a common good.




 

attention-span.net











- INTRODUCTION
- PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION

- PROPAGANDA
- Model of Tchakhotine
- strategic Propaganda
- tactical Propaganda

- MISINFORMATION
- signs
- operations
- channels
- Objects of the misinformation

- ACTIVE MEASUREMENTS
- Assassination and intoxication
- subversion

- The PLANNING Of PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION
- CONCLUSION
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- APPENDIX 1

Acceuil


SIGNS


The misinformations can be classified (Durandin, 1993) by processes different made up from the three following categories: the sign, the operation and channels: Signs

There can be several signs which one shows with the target to make a misinformation: the oral or written words, the images (photographs and films), the false phenomena, distort them actions (spontaneous alleged demonstrations) and the false documents (counterfeit). If several different signs which agree to describe the same lie the effect of the misinformation increases. Durandin (1993) note two kinds of lies: tactic (lie aiming to directly modify the control of a target) and media (lie aiming at modifying control via its public image).

In addition to being able to present the lies in factual information, the existence of words makes believe in the existence of thing, therefore by the language one can instigate a judgement of existence and value (Durandin, 1993). To find words which carry is more significant than to transmit objective data.

The double language is a kind of misinformation which uses the language as sign. It consists in saying two different things to two different groups in connection with the same problem either by isolating the two recipients or or by keeping the truth that with the high level executives (Durandin, 1993).

The faking of the photographs was for a long time very complex and the photograph became a very faithful means to represent reality. Consequently, they became very probable instruments to make believe a false reality (Durandin, 1993). Today, with the means of current computer graphics, all photographs or all films can be handled in any way.

The use of false document is done is by cachant/détruisant/substituant documents or by creating false documents or by falsifying the existing documents (Durandin, 1993). The "false forgeries" consist to create a false document, "to discover it" and then to allot of it the source at the adversary (Durandin, 1993). Another "false forgery" consists in deforming its signature in order to leave a door of exit ("This is not my signature") if the situation becomes unfavorable (Durandin, 1993). The user can make some is a tactical use (to influence the behavior of the antagonist) or media (to harm the reputation of the target) (Durandin, 1993).




 

attention-span.net











- INTRODUCTION
- PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION

- PROPAGANDA
- Model of Tchakhotine
- strategic Propaganda
- tactical Propaganda

- MISINFORMATION
- signs
- operations
- channels
- Objects of the misinformation

- ACTIVE MEASUREMENTS
- Assassination and intoxication
- subversion

- The PLANNING Of PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION
- CONCLUSION
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- APPENDIX 1

Acceuil


OPERATIONS


The operations constitute the various ways of deteriorating the representation of reality. It are a function of the choice that the desinformator makes elements be shown or not and function of its thesis (Durandin, 1993). This last can either reduce elements (omission of facts, negation, minimization or removal of trace), or to emphasize elements (exaggeration, exhibition) or or to make a combination of both (to exaggerate the importance of certain facts and to omit others of them). If it misses elements to support a thesis, the desinformator can invent some. The omission is the easiest operation because it does not raise contradiction (Durandin, 1993).

The surpresentation is a technique giving the illusion to take part in the activity and to be able to do something with the situation. It is enough to present a maximum of information (often on line) superfluous in order to mask significant information (Durandin, 1993). This technique is abundantly used on CNN, and was one of the principal misinformations of the war of the Gulf (Durandin, 1993) with the control of the journalists (McCormack, 1995) and of disseminated information (Rakos, 1993)




 

attention-span.net











- INTRODUCTION
- PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION

- PROPAGANDA
- Model of Tchakhotine
- strategic Propaganda
- tactical Propaganda

- MISINFORMATION
- signs
- operations
- channels
- Objects of the misinformation

- ACTIVE MEASUREMENTS
- Assassination and intoxication
- subversion

- The PLANNING Of PSYCHOLOGICAL ACTION
- CONCLUSION
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- APPENDIX 1

Acceuil


CHANNELS


The channels are the means used to transmit the misinformation. Certain channels aim at the population as a whole, while others target specific groups (Durandin, 1993). The channels which touch the population as a whole are: media of masses (press, radio, films, televisions, etc), abstract communications (rumour, conversation), organizations of masses (ONG, Community groups), cultural event (festival, sports) or of the movements of mass (ecomovement, peaceful, etc). The channels which target specific groups are specialized periodicals, professional organizations (congress, etc), confidential alleged signs, influential people or agents of influence (member of the services of information). The recipients can be reached by several channels what increases the credibility of the misinformation (Durandin, 1993).

While placing the psychological actions on a continuum on the basis of an extreme communication (propaganda) and other an extreme direct operation (active measurement). The use of the media of masses at ends of misinformation transposes this one to the limits of propaganda while the use of agent of influences to the limits of active measurements. The media are considered by all the authors a target of first choice for the misinformation with fine offensives or defensives (Durandin, 1993; Volkoff, 1986; Montifroy, 1994). The use of journalists is useful bus:

  1. they always do not have time to check their sources because of the extremely competitive medium of their employment,
  2. they are easily influenceable (blackmail, corruption),
  3. they are credible and
  4. they have access to vast means of diffusion (Durandin, 1993).

This situation is clean companies allowing the freedom of _expression. The companies not leaving this freedom to all fine practice are immunized against the offensive misinformation (Volkoff, 1986).

The newspapers can be a means of misinformation in times of peace is:

  1. by imitating an existing newspaper containing of false news,
  2. by creating or buying a newspaper in order to present its vision of the things,
  3. by subsidizing a newspaper secretly,
  4. by using agents of influence on a journalist or
  5. via publi-propaganda paid in a newspaper with great pulling (Durandin, 1993).

The waves radios are not subjected to the borders between the states. The misinformation can be done:

  1. while emitting starting from a radio station of another country,
  2. by using a wave very close to an existing station or
  3. by buying an existing radio in times of peace (Durandin, 1993).

In times of war the radio can be used to demoralize the adversary

  1. by giving him false bad news,
  2. by exciting the enemies of our enemies or
  3. by giving true information militarily tactical for then giving false information in order to tighten a ambush (Durandin, 1993).

This type of diffusion is associated black propaganda. No television set was so far to consider black, on the other hand the contents of certain emissions would have could be influenced by certain occult agents (Durandin, 1993).

The actor désinforme in a newspaper or a radio is:

  1. by presenting only false news for which the listener cannot check,
  2. while selecting that new energy in the direction of its intentions,
  3. by mixing true information and false information,
  4. in "commenting on" true information,
  5. by exposing true news with concrete evidence in a context which changes the direction them,
  6. by enlarging and disfiguring true information in order to cause strong feelings among listeners,
  7. by giving an unequal distribution length and quality of information,
  8. by equipping information distorts with a real fact and
  9. by giving information without conclusion so that the listener does itself the conclusion which is essential (Durandin, 1993). Notice that certain journalists use these techniques to present their points of view without that appearing.