The Remote Manipulation
of the Human Brain
http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/sc04eiw.htm
“Microwaves pulsed in the sleep
frequency would cause the synchronization of the brain's activity with the sleep
frequency and in this way produce sleep. “
In October 2000, Congressman Denis J.
Kucinich introduced in the House of Representatives a bill, which would oblige
the American president to engage in negotiations aimed at the ban of space based weapons.
In this bill, the definition of a
weapons system included:
"any other unacknowledged or as yet
undeveloped means inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a
person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and
economic well-being of a person)… through the use of land-based, sea- based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at
individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war,
mood management, or mind control of such persons or
populations“(15).
As in all legislative acts quoted in
this article, the bill pertains to sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation
of the human brain.
Psychotronic weapons belong, at least for a layman uninformed of secret military research, in the sphere
of science fiction, since so far none of the published scientific experiments
has been presented in a meaningful way to World public opinion.
That it is feasible to manipulate human
behavior with the use of subliminal, either by sound
or visual messages, is now generally known and acknowledged by the scientific
community.
This is why in most countries, the use
of such technologies, without the consent of the individual concerned, is in
theory banned. Needless to say, the use of these
technologies is undertaken covertly, without the knowledge or consent of
targeted individuals.
Devices using light for the stimulation
of the brain constitute another mechanism whereby light flashing under certain
frequencies could be used to manipulate the human
psychic.
As for the use of sound, a device
transmitting a beam of sound waves, which can be heard
only by persons at whom the beam of sound waves is targeted, has been reported
in several news media. In this case, the beam is formed by a combination of
sound and ultrasound waves which causes the targeted
person to hear the sound inside his head. Such a procedure could affect the
mental balance of the targeted individual as well as convince him that he is, so
to speak, mentally ill.
This article examines the development of
technologies and knowledge pertaining to the functioning of the human brain and
the way new methods of manipulation of the human mind are
being developed.
Electromagnetic energy
One of the
main methods of manipulation is through electromagnetic energy.
In the declassified scientific
literature only some 30 experiments have been published supporting this
assumption (1),(2). Already in 1974, in the USSR, after
successful testing within a military unit in Novosibirsk, the Radioson (Radiosleep) was
registered with the Government Committee on Matters of Inventions and
Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means
of radio waves (3), (4), (5).
In the scientific literature, technical
feasibility of inducing sleep in a human being through the use
of radio waves is confirmed in a book by an British scientist involved in
research on the biological effects of electromagnetism (6). A report by the
World Health Organisation (WHO) on nonionizing
radiation published in 1991 confirms that:
"many of biological effects observed in animals exposed to ELF
fields appear to be associated, either directly or indirectly, with the nervous
system…" (2).
Among the published experiments, there
are those where pulsed microwaves have caused the synchronization of isolated
neurons with the frequency of pulsing of microwaves. Ffor example, a neuron firing at a frequency of 0.8 Hz was forced in this way to fire the impulses at a frequency of
1 Hz. Moreover, the pulsed microwaves contributed to changing the concentration
of neurotransmitters in the brain (neurotransmitters are a part of the mechanism which causes the firing of neurons in the brain)
and reinforcing or attenuating the effects of drugs delivered into the brain
(1).
The experiment where the main brain
frequencies registered by EEG were synchronized with the frequency of microwave
pulsing (1,2) might explain the function of the Russian
installation Radioson. Microwaves pulsed in the sleep
frequency would cause the synchronization of the brain's activity with the sleep
frequency and in this way produce sleep.
Pulsing of microwaves in frequency
predominating in the brain at an awakened state could, by the
same procedure, deny sleep to a human being.
A report derived from the testing
program of the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute
of Research states
"Microwave
pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation
similar to electric stimulation unrelated to heat".
In a many times replicated experiment,
microwaves pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from
the nerve cells (1,2). Calcium plays a key role in the
firing of neurons and Ross Adey, member of the first
scientific team which published this experiment,
publicly expressed his conviction that this effect of electromagnetic radiation
would interfere with concentration on complex tasks (7).
Robert Becker, who had share in the
discovery of the effect of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones,
published the excerpts from the report from Walter Reed Army Institute testing
program. In the first part "prompt debilitation
effects" should have been tested (8). Were not those effects
based on the experiment by Ross Adey and others
with calcium efflux?
British scientist John Evans, working in
the same field, wrote that both Ross Adey and Robert
Becker lost their positions and research grants and called them "free-thinking
exiles" (6). In 1975, in the
Let us assume that the words delivered
into the brain were transcribed into ultrasound
frequencies. Would not then the subject perceive those same words as his own
thoughts?
And would this not imply that his behavior was being controlled in this way through the
transmission of ultrasound frequencies? In this regard, the American Air Force
1982 "Final Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For
Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000" states:
"While initial
attention should be toward degradation of human performance through thermal
loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the
possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using
externally applied fields…" (10).
Several scientists have warned that the
latest advances in neurophysiology could be used for
the manipulation of the human brain.
In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the American Navy's project of
Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons, published a scientific article where he
states:
"the technical capability to influence
directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human
species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating
neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the
species are immersed… is now marginally feasible“ (11).
In 1998, the French National Bioethics
Committee warned that "neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing a
potential threat to human rights“ (12). In May 1999 the
neuroscientists conference, sponsored by the UN, took
place in
"Today we have
intellectual, physical and financial resources to master the power of the brain
itself, and to develop devices to touch the mind and even control or erase
consciousness…We wish to profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves
peace and welfare" (13).
On the international political scene, in
the last few years, the concept of remote control of the human brain has become
a matter of international and intergovernmental negotiation. In January 1999,
the European Parliament passed a resolution where it called "for an
international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and
deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human
beings.“ (14)
Already in 1997, nine
states of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) addressed the UN, OBSE and the states of the Interparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at the
agenda of the General Assembly of the United Nations, the preparation and
adoption of an international convention "On Prevention of Informational Wars
and Limitation of Circulation of Informational Weapons" (16),
(3).
Informational Weapons
The
initiative was originally proposed, in the Russian State Duma, by Vladimir Lopatin (3). V. Lopatin worked,
from 1990 to 1995, in sequence, in the standing committees on Security
respectively of the Russian Federation, Russian State Duma and of the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS), specializing in informational security.(3). The
concept of informational weapon or informational war is rather unknown to the
world general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together with Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov, published a book „Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia“ (3). There we find the explanation of this terminology:
"In the report
on the research of the American Physical Society for the year 1993 the
conclusion is presented that psychophysical weapon systems…can be used… for the
construction of a strategic arm of a new type (informational weapon in
informational war)…"
Among many references
on this subject, we refer to Materials of the Parliament Hearings "Threats and
Challenges in the Sphere of Informational Security", Moscow, July 1996,
"Informational Weapon as a Threat to the National Security of the Russian
Federation" (analytical report of the Intelligence Service of the Russian
Federation), Moscow, 1996 and a material "To Whom Will Belong the Conscientious
Weapon in the 21st Century", Moscow, 1997. (17).
In 2000 V.
Lopatin introduced, after two other authors, the third
in order bill on the subject of "Informational and Psychological Security of the
"…Means of informational-psychological
influence are capable not only of harming the health of an individual, but, also
of causing, according to Lopatin, 'the blocking of
freedom of will of human being on the subliminal level, the loss of the ability
of political, cultural and social self identification, the manipulation of
societal consciousness, which could lead to the destruction of a sense of
collective identify by the Russian people and nation'“ (16).
In the book "Psychotronic Weapons and the Security of Russia", the
authors propose among the basic principles of the Russian concept of defense against the remote control of the human psyche not
only the acknowledgement of its existence, but also the fact that the methods of
informational and psychotronic war are fully
operational ("and are being used without a formal declaration of war")
(18). They also
quote the record from the session of the
"cause the
blocking of the freedom of will of a human being on a subliminal level" or
"instillation into the consciousness or subconsciousness of a human being of
information which will trigger a faulty or erroneous perception of reality"
(19).
In that regard, they proposed the
preparation of national legislation as well as the establishment of legal
international norms "aimed at the defense of human
psyche against subliminal, destructive and informational manipulations" (20).
Moreover, they also propose the
declassification of all analytical studies and research on the various
technologies. They warned that, because this research has remained classified
and removed from the public eye, it has allowed the arms race to proceed
unabated. It has thereby contributed to increasing the possibility of psychotronic war.
Among the possible sources of remote
influence on human psyche, the authors list the "generators of physical
fields“ of "known as well as unknown nature" (21). In
1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the
Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published the report
on Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation
in Manchester (UK) (22,
http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf ).
One of four major subjects of the study
pertained to the so-called "Second Generation“ or "non
lethal" technologies:
"This report
evaluates the second generation of 'non-lethal' weapons which are emerging from
national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part
of the Clinton Administration's 'non-lethal' warfare doctrine now adopted in
turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed
energy beam,…radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate
human targets" (23) The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘
crowd control … technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency
or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest concern is with systems which can
directly interact with the human nervous system“ (24). The report also
states that „perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in
secrecy“ (25).
The unavailability of official documents
confirming the existence of this technology may be the reason why the OMEGA
report is referencing, with respect to mind control technology, the internet
publication of the author of this article
(26
http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf ).
Similarly, the internet publication of
the director of the American Human Rights and Anti-mind Control Organization
(CAHRA), Cheryl Welsh, is
referenced by the joint initiative of the Quaker United Nations Office,
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, and Programme for Strategic
and International Security Studies, with respect to non-lethal weapons (27).
On
"The
achievements of contemporary science… allow for creation of measured methods of
secret, remote influencing on the psyches and physiology of a person or a group
of people“ (28). The committee recommended that the
addendum be approved. The addendum to the article 6 of
the
"within the territory of the Russian
Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects… the
effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic,
light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations…“ (29).
In this way, the Russian government made
a first step to stand up to its dedication to the ban of mind control
technology.
In the Doctrine of Informational
Security of the
"the threat to
the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of
spiritual life… individual, group and societal consciousness“ and "illegal use
of special means affecting individual, group and societal consciousness" (30).
Among the major directions of the international cooperation toward the
guaranteeing of the informational security is listed „the ban of production,
dissemination and use of 'informational weapon‘ “
(31).
The foregoing statement should be interpreted as the continuing Russian commitment to
the international ban of the means of remote influencing of the activity of the
human brain.
Similarly, in the above mentioned report, published by the STOA, the originally
proposed version of the resolution of the European Parliament calls for:
"an
international convention for a global ban on all research and development… which
seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other
functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable
the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible
deployment of such systems.“(32)
Here the term "actual" might easily mean
that such weapons are already deployed.
Among the countries with the most
advanced military technologies is the
All the same, according to the study
published by STOA, the
The report published by STOA states: "In
October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place
in allied arsenals" (33). "In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army
included… directed energy systems" and "radio frequency weapons" (34) - those
weapons, as was suggested in the STOA report as well, are being associated with
the effects on the human nervous system.
According to the Russian government
informational agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years,U.S. expenditures on the development and acquisition
of the means of informational war has increased fourfold, and at present they
occupy the first place among all military programs (17),(3).
Though there are possible uses of
informational war, which do not imply mind control, the US Administration has
been unwilling to engage in negotiations on the ban on all forms of manipulation
of the human brain. This unwillingness might indeed suggest that the
One clear consequence of the
continuation of the apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies
enabling remote control of the human brain is that the governments, who own such
technologies, could use them without having to consult public opinion. Needless to say, any meaningful democracy in today's world
could be disrupted, through secret and covert operations. It is not inconceivable that in the future, entire population
groups subjected to mind control technologies, could be living in a "fake
democracy" where their own government or a foreign power could broadly shape
their political opinions by means of mind control technologies.
REFERENCES
1)
Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 1996, CRC Press Inc.,
0-8493-0641-8/96, - pg. 117, 119, 474- 485, 542-551, 565 at the top and third
and last paragraph
2)
World Health Organization report on non-ionizing radiation from 1991, pg. 143
and 207-208
3)
V. Lopatin, V Cygankov:
„Psichotronnoje oružie i bezopasnost Rossii“, SINTEG,
4)
G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov:
„Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k realijam“, Russsian Federation,
5)
With greatest likelihood as well the Russian daily TRUD, which has organized the search for the documents,
7)
Robert Becker: "Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life",
William Morrow and comp.,
8)
Robert Becker: "Cross Currents, teh Startling Effects
of Electromagnetic Radiation on your Health", 1991, Bloomsburry Publishing,
9)
Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391 - 401
10)
Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane
Maning: "Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology", Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN 0-9648812--0-9, pg. 169
11)
M. A. Persinger: „On the Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of
Fundamental Algorythms“, Perception and Motor Skills,
June1995,, sv. 80, str. 791-799
12)
Nature, vol.391, 22.1.1998,str.316, „Advances in
Neurosciences May Threaten Human Rights“
13)
Internet reference at the site of the United Nations University and Institute of
Advanced Studies in Tokyo does not work any more, to verify the information it
is necessary to find the document from the 1999 UN sponsored conference of
neuroscientists in Tokyo, you may inquire at the address unuias@ias.unu.edu 14)
http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1 . click at Plenary sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4
number –click, choose 1999 and fill in 005 to A4 or search for Resolution on the
environment, security and foreign policy from
15)
http://thomas.loc.gov./ and search for Space Preservation Act then click at
H.R.2977
16)
Russian daily Segodnya, 11.
February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov: „Vsadniki psychotronitscheskovo apokalypsa"
(Riders of Psychotronic Apokalypse)
17)
See ref. 3), pg. 107
18)
See ref. 3) pg. 97
19)
See ref. 3), pg. 107
20)
See ref. 3), pg. 108
21)
See ref. 3) pg. 13
22)
http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
23)
see ref. 22 pg. XIX or 25
24)
see ref. 22 pg. LIII or 69
25)
see ref. 22 pg. XLVII or 63, aswell pg. VII-VIII or 7-8, pg. XIX or 25, pg. XLV or 61
26)
see ref. 22) pg. LIII or 69,
note 354
27)
http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide%20 CAHRA and
Cheryl Welsh are listed at the page 24
28)
Document sent by Moscow Committee of Ecology of Dwellings. Telephone:
29)
Search www.rambler.ru , there "poisk" (search) and search for "gosudarstvennaja duma" (State Duma) (it is necessary to type
in Russian alphabet), at the page which appears choose "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy"
(Informational Channel of the Russian State Duma), there "federalnyje zakony podpisanyje prezidentom RF" (Federal laws signed by president of the Russian
Federation), choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, č.
N 103-F3 (July 26, 2001, number N 103- F3) , "O vnesenii dopolnenija v statju 6 federalnogo zakona ob oružii" (addendum to the
article 6 of the Federal law on weapons)
30)
Search www.rambler.ru and then (type in Russian
alphabet) "gosudarstvennaja duma", next "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy"
(informational channel of the State Duma), next search by use of "poisk" (search) Doktrina informacionnoj bezopasnosti Rossii" "Doctrine of the Informational Security of the
Russian Federation) there see pg. 3 "Vidy informacionnych ugroz bezopasnosti Rossijskkoj federacii" (Types of Threats to the Informational Security
of the Russian Federation)
31)
See ref. 30, pg. 19, "Měždunarodnoje sotrudničestvo Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti obespečenija informacionnoj bezopasnoti" (International Cooperation of the
32)
See ref.22, pg. XVII or 33
33)
See ref.22, pg. XLV or 61
34)
See ref.22 pg. XLVI or 62
Mojmir
Babacek is the founder of the International Movement
for the Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical Means,
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
.
He is the author of numerous articles on the issue of mind manipulation.
© Copyright belongs
to the author, 2004. For fair use only/ pour usage équitable seulement.
Originating source:
Centre for Research on
Globalization (CRG