http://www.newswithviews.com/NWVexclusive/exclusive34.htm
9/11 VIDEO SHOCKS
A new 9-11 video was screened last night in
'911 in Plane Site' presents actual film from that fateful day and careful
analysis focusing on the Pentagon and the two
One particular interview that brought gasps from
the audience and many looking around with shock etched on their faces was an
interview conducted - live at the time - by FOX News. This intense interview
with Mark Burnback, an employee of FOX News, contains
the following narrative, paraphrased: Burnback was close to the path of the second plane and had a good long look
at what he describes was not a commercial airliner. The plane that hit
the second tower had no windows, Burnback
was very clear about that. The plane had some kind of blue logo on the front
near the nose and looked like a cargo plane. This point was driven to the
viewer several times along with the comment from this FOX employee that
"this plane wasn't from around here or anything you'd see take off from
the airport."
Other footage includes several women who had a very clear view watching the
second plane hit were yelling, "That wasn't American Airlines....It wasn't American Airlines going into the
building." These interviews were played that
morning once on FOX News, never to be replayed again, despite the massive
saturation and repetition by the media for many days to come.
Other extremely disturbing segments of this video are the clear, slow motion
shots of the second plane going into the towers which
show a flash right before the nose of the plane hits the building and a pod
attached to the bottom of the plane. This strange flash is
clearly recorded from four different angles from four different cameras.
While there is only one known piece of film showing the first plane hitting the
first tower, in slow motion one can clearly see - as with the second plane - a
flash from the nose section right before impact. What
caused this?
This video raises extremely disturbing questions about the planes that hit the
Pentagon and the
According to the producers, the purpose of '911 in Plane Site' is to
demonstrate that Americans saw one thing that morning that was so shocking, so
horrific and so massive, the finer details weren't really being picked up. The
producer reinforces to the viewer that after one broadcast of many very
controversial interviews live on the spot, these particular interviews were never broadcast again, i.e. firefighters
on the spot talking about the explosions and bombs inside the towers. Since
9-11, it has been reported that "Building Seven"
collapsed because of the two
'911 in Plane Site,' distributed by Power Hour Productions (866-773-9469),
leaves one with many questions as demonstrated by a very upset senior citizen
who requested her last name be withheld. Mary asked, "If these weren't
commercial airliners, where are those flights? Where are the passengers? My,
God what really happened that day?" Indeed, this seemed to be the biggest
question expressed by viewers after the lights came back on, but for which
there were no answers. Some viewers were visibly upset, angry and "want
damn answers" from the Bush Administration. Others just walked out the door
in silence. One upset man commented on the way out of the viewing, "It's
time to get this on PBS and every investigative news
program on TV. We need answers."
---
See also:
Dayton: FAA, NORAD hid 9/11 failures (July 31, 2004) http://www.startribune.com/stories/1576/4904237.html
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn.,
charged Friday that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)and
the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) have covered up "catastrophic failures"
that left the nation vulnerable during the Sept. 11 hijackings. "For
almost three years now, NORAD officials and FAA officials have been able to hide their critical
failures that left this country defenseless during
two of the worst hours in our history,"